Philosophy and Psychology (Translated)

# The Roads Are Many, the Destination Is One The riddle begins where all riddles do—in the space between what we know and what we imagine we know. We are born into a world already mapped, already interpreted, already made comfortable by the certainties of others. The paths stretch before us like old rope, worn smooth by ten thousand feet. We are told: follow this one, it leads somewhere true. But the destination whispers a different story. To speak of many paths and a single end is to speak of something older than geography, older than the roads themselves. It is to acknowledge that the surface of things—the colors and textures and precise directions—matters less than we have been taught. A man climbing a mountain in the snow sees only white. Another, crossing a desert, sees only sand. A third walks through a forest dark with questions. Yet if we ask them where they go, might they not answer with the same word? Not the same place, perhaps, but the same *becoming*. The same arrival at something irreducible. The world insists on difference. It counts the paths: the path of reason and the path of faith, the path of action and the path of surrender, the path of flesh and the path of spirit. We catalog them like botanists pressing flowers into a book. We argue about which is straightest, which is most true. A thousand philosophies have made a thousand maps, each declaring itself the only honest one. And all the while, the destination—silent, patient, singular—waits somewhere beyond argument. There is a peculiar violence in forcing the many into the one, just as there is a peculiar blindness in denying that the one exists. The seeker who says "There is only my path" has mistaken a footprint for the earth itself. But the one who says "All paths lead nowhere" has perhaps mistaken the fog for the summit. Consider the mystic and the mathematician, separated by centuries and temperament. One dissolves the self into silence; the other builds cathedrals of pure logic. Their methods are antithetical—oil and water, fire and ice. Yet listen to them speak of their deepest moments, and you will hear the same trembling in the voice. Both have touched something that unmakes the separate self. Both have stood, for an instant, in the presence of something vast and wholly other. They speak in different languages, but they have been to the same country. The boundary between them is not a wall but a threshold that appears only from one side. This is not to say that all paths are equally wise, equally safe, or equally beautiful. Some roads are indeed cruel. Some lead into circles. Some are paved with the deceptions we tell ourselves in the dark. Discernment matters. Consciousness matters. The choice of how we walk matters profoundly. But beneath these distinctions lies something the choosing cannot touch—a direction that is not chosen but discovered, a gravity that draws all sincere seeking toward itself. We live in an age suspicious of unity. It feels like an old trick, a sleight of hand meant to erase the particular and the precious. We fear that to speak of one destination is to diminish the dignity of the varied human journey, to suggest that our individual struggles are less real, less significant. But what if the opposite is true? What if the destination is singular precisely *because* it can only be reached through the infinite particularities of individual becoming? What if unity does not erase difference but rather *requires* it—as a symphony requires many notes, not one repeated forever? The paths are many because we are many. Because consciousness itself is endlessly creative, endlessly capable of generating new approaches to the eternal questions. Because a human being contains multitudes, and no single method can excavate all that is buried there. The diversity of paths is not a failure of the universe to communicate; it is the universe's way of speaking to every ear, in every language, through every possible doorway. Yet the destination is one because, in the end, there is only one truth about the nature of things. Not one *explanation*—God knows there are infinite explanations, infinite frameworks and metaphors and conceptual architectures. But one reality toward which all sincere inquiry bends. One ground from which all things arise. One silence underlying all sound. Call it what you will: the Absolute, the Real, Being itself, the Ground of existence, or no name at all. The mystic approaches it through ecstasy; the scholar through reason; the lover through devotion; the artist through beauty; the ordinary person through the simple act of paying attention. Yet they are all moving toward the same center, even if they cannot see each other on their separate paths. This knowledge—that the destination is one—should bring not arrogance but humility. How can one be certain of having reached what cannot be named? How can one claim exclusive knowledge of what is known only in the abandonment of all claims? The paths are many partly because the destination forever exceeds our grasp, forever refuses to be contained in any single formula, any single experience, any single way of speaking. To live with this understanding is to hold two truths simultaneously: to honor your own path—its particular genius, its earned insights, its irreplaceable texture—while remaining open to the possibility that others, walking differently, are nonetheless drawing near to the same mystery. It is to move through the world with both conviction and compassion. With the confidence of one who knows something true, and the gentleness of one who knows that what is true cannot be fully possessed or explained. The roads are many. The destination is one. And perhaps the most important thing we can learn is this: the wandering itself is not a means to an end but part of the end itself. The journey is not a preliminary to arrival but arrival happening along the way. Each step, each turn of the path, each moment of doubt and illumination—these are not obstacles between us and the destination. They *are* the destination, unfolding. So walk your path with full commitment, full awareness, full love. But remember: somewhere ahead, or perhaps beside you, unseen but not absent, others walk too. And though the road beneath your feet is yours alone, the horizon you move toward is theirs as well.

Sri Ramakrishna explains things so simply. I am breaking down and rewriting from my own understanding of the 'Kathamrita'.

Lord Sri Krishna says in the Bhagavad Gita (12/4):
Sanniyanmanendriyo-gram sarvatra sama-buddhayah.
Te prapnuvanti mam eva sarva-bhuta-hite ratah..

Word-meaning: sarvatra (everywhere) sama-buddhayah (possessed of equanimous wisdom) sarva-bhuta-hite (in the welfare of all beings) ratah (engaged or absorbed) [becoming] cha indriya-gramam (and the senses) sanniyan (restrained) te (they) mam eva (me alone) prapnuvanti (attain).

Translation: (Yet) those who are equanimous everywhere and devoted to the welfare of all creatures, who have withdrawn the senses from their objects—[they worship that unmanifest, unthinkable, immutable, all-pervading, changeless, eternal, imperishable Brahman,] they too attain me.

Through mastery of the senses, through compassion for all beings, and
through equanimity towards all creatures, they too attain me.
(Taken from Vishwadeb Mukhopadhyay's 'Mahapayaramrita Gita')

The Essence:

Jagadish Chandra Ghosh: "Through worship of the attributeless, too, I am attained, for I am the Supreme Person possessing both attributelessness and attributes—both are but different manifestations of my being."

Swami Apurvananda: "Whether one worships the Lord with attributes or without, one attains him—this is what Sri Krishna makes clear when he says that those who meditate upon the imperishable Brahman also attain me... For he is both saguna and nirguna; and they shall attain that Vasudeva."

This part of the verse deserves special attention: sarva-bhuta-hite ratah—engaged in the welfare of all creatures.

The Master was out on the water that day (27 October 1882) with the esteemed Keshab Sen. The steamboat was rushing swiftly toward Calcutta. Everyone sat absorbed, listening to the Master's words. Time flowed on; nobody noticed.

Puffed rice and coconut were being eaten. Everyone ate with joy. Keshab had arranged the snacks. Keshab and Vijay sat huddled together. The Master had to kindle affection between these two innocent souls.

Sri Ramakrishna, looking toward Keshab, spoke: Listen! Here comes Vijay. Your quarrels and disputes—they are like the war between Shiva and Rama. (The Master laughed.)

Rama's guru was Shiva. They fought, yes, but they also became one in spirit. But Shiva's ghosts and Rama's monkeys... their bickering and squabbling never ends! (The Master burst into loud laughter.)

That is how it is with those close to one another. Lav and Kush actually fought with Rama. And think of it—how much discord we see even between a mother and daughter! Now consider: when God himself is playing out his divine sport, why do we need Jatila and Kutila to complicate matters? The truth is, without them the Lord's play would not happen at all! (Everyone laughed.) Without them, would there be such fun and games? (The Master burst into loud laughter again.)

Again, look at Ramanuja—he was a philosopher of qualified non-dualism. His guru was an advaitin. In the end, the two disagreed. Guru and disciple began refuting each other's views. Such things do happen. Whatever may be, they are still one's own people!

Ah, how beautifully Sri Ramakrishna is explaining this to us!

Think about it: among Krishna, Ramakrishna, Anukulchandra, Swarupa Ananda, Nigmananda, Jagadbandhdu, Ram Thakur, and Hari Chandra—is there any quarreling or wrangling? How could there be? They are all pointing toward the same destination!

Lord Sri Krishna himself is saying: Keep your senses restrained, do good to all (harm none), let there not for a moment enter your mind the thought "this one is mine, that one is not mine"—live thus, and you shall attain me.

The heart of it is this: if one follows the Lord's teaching, there is no room for such division and distance! The great souls themselves did not do such things, nor did they teach their followers to do so. Yet look—what an absurd circus is playing out all around us!

Over there, between Rama and Shiva, not a whisper of trouble; but here, between monkeys and ghosts, the quarreling never ends!

Unless a man stops to think whether this is love of God or mere business, he will never become human—he’ll spend his whole life shrieking like a monkey or a ghost, until his breath runs out.

Those who make us dance like monkeys are no godly men; they’re merely money-men. We leap from tree to tree, pluck bananas for them; they feast and smile, and graciously leave us the peels. And God, watching it all, will chuckle and say: So you’ve stayed monkeys after all! There was no need for you to become human!

The man who judges others in order to find God is merely lording it over God himself. Such a man is no man at all—he is either a monkey or a ghost. The monkey leaps; the ghost shrieks. Has anyone ever found God by leaping or shrieking? Prayer is always hidden, always silent and secret.

A man who has no knowledge of his own prayer—
yet seeks to know the prayers of others!

Can anything come of this?

Share this article

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *