We must learn how to communicate with others. We need to master the art of listening—of resisting the temptation to speak, of hearing what others have to say. The first thing required when we wish to connect with someone is patience. To arrive at judgments about a person without truly knowing them, or to form opinions about matters without proper understanding, is nothing short of folly. My conduct, my words—they can make me appear as a saint or a demon in the eyes of others. If we could see beyond the surface veil, we would glimpse the true human being. If we observe only the outward aspect of someone, what we come to know of them is not what they truly are.
To look into another's heart, we need eyes within our own heart—and we must see with those eyes alone. Whoever's heart is blind cannot perceive the Creator's presence within others. If we fail to see God in humanity, it becomes impossible to feel God within ourselves. When we sense something good in another, our own feelings become beautiful, become pure. The joy we gain from this belongs to the richness of our own hearts. Do not judge how much better you are than another. Assume instead that you are worse than everyone else—yet remember, you did not come into this world to remain bad. You possess all the capacity to be good. If you can properly align this self-confidence with your will, you will become a better person than you are now.
Self-satisfaction cripples a person. We have not been given the right or the responsibility to judge what heaven is like, what hell is like, who is wicked, who is evil, who is beautiful to look upon, who is ugly, who is fortunate, who is unfortunate, who is virtuous, who is sinful, who is of good character, who is of bad character. We do not even truly know ourselves—how then can we know others? Who can say whom the Creator loves and whom the Creator dislikes? How does it enter our minds that I alone am pure, I alone am right, and all others are mistaken? Oh, what senselessness! How utterly absurd! It is not our work to judge others. The more we criticize others, the more indifferent we become to our own ugliness. Such indifference destroys a person entirely.
If we must reflect at all, let us contemplate the elevated aspects of people, let us evaluate those. From such reflection will emerge a measure of how much we ourselves must develop. As for what is good for us and what is bad, no one—not a single soul—can ever tell us. Neither friend, nor parent, nor teacher, nor spiritual guide. We must listen carefully to the "I" that dwells within us. The voice of our own heart never speaks falsehood.
Instead of wasting life searching for water, if only we could make our hearts understand how desperately we thirst for it, we would see an inexhaustible spring arise before our very eyes. We set aside a vessel brimming with water in the corner of our heart's chamber, yet we wander the whole world in search of a single drop. Alas—"Lalon died of thirst for water, though the Meghna river flowed near / A full pitcher at hand, yet the thirst could not be quenched!"
# The Pitcher at Hand There is a paradox that haunts those who think deeply about desire and sufficiency. We speak of contentment as though it were a virtue to be acquired, a state to be won through discipline or wisdom. Yet the moment we pursue it, it recedes. The hunger to cease hunger becomes itself a hunger—and here lies the trap. I think of an old story my grandmother told me, about a man who owned a water pitcher. It was clay, nothing remarkable—the kind you find in any village, glazed with time and use. Each morning he would fill it from the well, and each evening he would drink from it. The water was always there, cool and sufficient. He never once wondered if the pitcher was enough. He never measured its capacity against his thirst. It simply *was*, and he lived. But then one day someone told him: "You know, if you saved this water, if you were careful, you could fill a larger vessel. You could store more. You could be secure." The man, reasonable and prudent, began to worry. He looked at his pitcher with new eyes—suddenly it seemed small. Insufficient. He began to calculate: How long would this water last if he could not reach the well? What if the well dried? What if, what if, what if? He acquired a bigger vessel. Then another. His courtyard filled with pitchers, each one a hedge against some imagined deprivation. And now, strangely, he was never certain he had enough. The more he gathered, the more desperately he feared losing it. The abundance became a burden. This is the condition of modern consciousness, I think. We have confused the fullness of what is present with the emptiness of what might be absent. We have made a category error: we have taken the finite and tried to fill it with the infinite. A pitcher, by its nature, has limits. But desire, once weaponized into anxiety, has none. The ancients knew something we have forgotten. They spoke of *santosha*—a Sanskrit word that means something like contentment, but it is not passive resignation. It is not the contentment of the defeated. Rather, it is the recognition of a threshold: here is what is in my hands; here is what I can actually use; here is where wisdom begins. Not in what I lack, but in what I hold. I do not say this easily. I know the world presses upon us with real needs. There are those for whom the pitcher is genuinely empty, and cruelty would be to tell them to find peace in scarcity. But for those of us who have crossed some threshold of security—and that includes most who read these words—we face a different problem. Not deprivation, but the inability to stop the machine of wanting. We have become addicted to the movement toward more, as though movement itself were proof of life. What if we tried, just for a moment, to be still with what fills our hands? Not forever. Not as a permanent renunciation. But as an experiment in presence. To look at the pitcher—the actual one, not the imagined one we might fill tomorrow—and ask: Is this enough? And to listen, without immediately answering, to what the silence suggests. There is a Zen saying: "The full cup cannot receive." It means that when we are already brimming with plans, anxieties, and appetites, there is no room for what is actually here. The water in the pitcher cannot enter us because we are too full of thirst. So perhaps the practice is this: to empty, not the pitcher, but ourselves. To create a small space—not out of negation, but out of genuine curiosity—where we might taste what we already have. The cool water on a summer morning. The adequacy of the day as it arrives, not as it might have been, not as it could become. I do not know if this is wisdom. But I know it is restful. And rest, I have come to believe, is a form of knowledge the hurried world has forgotten to value. The pitcher sits on the shelf. It is neither full nor empty. It is exactly what it is. And that, for now, is enough.
Share this article