Philosophy and Psychology (Translated)

Ignorance-Knowledge: 126



In Heidegger's Being and Time and his later writings, the concept of "aletheia" becomes central. He argues that we typically think of truth as "correctness" (correspondence)—that is, whether a statement matches reality. But something deeper occurs beforehand: existence reveals itself, meaning "being" begins to show itself. This "showing," "unconcealment," "coming into presence"—these are the true forms of truth. When something is revealed, it becomes "unconcealed" through aletheia. In his words, "Truth is not the correspondence of a proposition, but that unconcealment through which something comes into presence." (Truth is not correctness, but unconcealment.)

Through this interpretation, Heidegger takes truth beyond the limits of knowledge to the level of an event of Being. Everything we see, understand, think—all becomes possible because the world unveils itself to us. Yet this unveiling is never complete; with each revelation, something remains hidden. Thus existence is never fully "open"; it always remains partially "concealed" as well. This duality makes human experience profound and mysterious.

As an example—when we view a work of art, it is not merely an object; a kind of truth is revealed within it—an experience that was previously concealed now becomes visible. In his essay The Origin of the Work of Art, Heidegger says that art is the realm where "the truth of Being" is unconcealed. There aletheia means a creative unveiling, where humans, art, and world together draw aside new veils of truth.

Here we see that for Heidegger, aletheia is not merely a philosophical term; it is an "ontological event." When humans understand something, think, love, fear—through these very actions the world reveals aspects of itself. We don't receive any fixed truth; rather, in each experience truth continuously unfolds.

From this perspective, truth is no longer imposed but revealed. Truth is not a judgment or definition, but that moment when reality shows itself. Thus aletheia is a constant process—of unconcealment, manifestation, and re-concealment.

In summary: aletheia means "unconcealment" or "unconcealedness"; it is the fundamental form of truth where existence reveals itself; this unveiling is never complete, always partial; humans are that being through which this unconcealment occurs.

Therefore, aletheia teaches us—truth can never be grasped as a fixed object; it is a living process where the world reveals itself somewhat in each moment, while keeping something hidden. And through this interplay of revelation and concealment, knowing and unknowing, light and darkness, humans learn to grasp the meaning of their own existence.

Another key characteristic of Dasein is its "thrownness" (Geworfenheit)—that is, we find ourselves "thrown" into this world. We did not choose birth, culture, time, language—yet our lives are shaped within all of these. In this thrown state, humans must live as their "possibility" (possibility); they are not a fixed entity but a continuous becoming. This is why Heidegger said humans are "beings of possibility" (Seinkönnen)—constantly shaping their existence through their decisions, responsibilities, and relationships.

In Heidegger's philosophy, two profound terms—Geworfenheit and Seinkönnen—represent opposing yet complementary aspects crucial to understanding human existence. Together they form the complete being-consciousness of Heidegger's "Dasein" or "being-in-the-world."

Geworfenheit comes from the verb werfen (to throw or cast); its literal meaning is "thrownness"—that is, humans are thrown into their existence; they do not initiate their own condition. At birth we suddenly find ourselves "thrown" into this world—our culture, society, language, body, family, history—all are already formed before us. We did not choose these; yet we must live within them. This "thrownness" is thus the primary truth of human existence—we are always bound to a context, cast into a situation.

But humans are not merely thrown; they are beings of possibility who possess the capacity to shape their own future. This aspect is what Heidegger called Seinkönnen—literally meaning "being able to be" or "the ability to come into being." Humans are beings who can shape themselves, who can make decisions within their thrown circumstances, who can choose among possibilities and create their own meaning. This Seinkönnen distinguishes humans from mechanical existence—they are not merely "what is" (being) but are also conscious of "what might become" (becoming).

Thus, the structure of human existence operates on two levels—Geworfenheit binds them to the ground of reality, while Seinkönnen teaches them to soar in the sky of possibility. Heidegger said, "Dasein is that being for whom its own existence is a question." Humans cannot escape thrownness, but choosing their possibilities within that thrown state—this is their freedom.

These two concepts together teach us to understand humans in a remarkable balance: we are free, but that freedom is always limited within a context; we are bound, yet those very bonds create the field of possibility. Geworfenheit tells us—"Where you are is not of your making"; and Seinkönnen says—"What you become is your decision." From this convergence emerges Heidegger's existentialism—where humans learn to understand themselves as "possible freedom within necessary dependence."

Consequently, humans do not merely become "thinking beings," but become beings who are thrown yet free; determined yet creative; finite yet full of possibility—that is, an existence in continuous dialogue, daily rewriting its own future.

Dasein is always temporal; it lives within the continuity of past, present, and future. To understand its existence means understanding its "temporality." The past makes it "thrown," the future draws it toward possibility, and the present is that moment of continuously making decisions where it creates its own meaning. This is why Heidegger says, "Existence can only be understood through time"—being is time.

In Heidegger's thought, death is not an endpoint—but the deepest unconcealment of existence. "Dasein"—the being conscious of its own existence—can be truly understood only when it stands face to face with its own death. Death here is not an external event that will simply occur someday in the future; rather it is an inherent possibility (the ownmost possibility)—an inevitability present in every moment.

Heidegger says "Dasein" is always rushing toward its future; but the most certain and self-designated event of that future is death. Death is thus its most 'ownmost' possibility—because while we can share all other experiences, death can only be experienced by oneself alone. No one can die for me; before death I am alone. This solitude is not despair but the clarity of existence—for when faced with the inevitability of death, humans realize how limited their life is, and within that limit they must choose, decide, create meaning.

This consciousness of death awakens humans to their authentic being—that is, their own, genuine, self-chosen existence. As long as humans push death away, they remain lost in "the world of others"—where one "thinks as everyone thinks; lives as everyone lives." Heidegger calls this state "Das Man"—the They-self—that is, that vague social entity that lives wearing society's mask instead of its own life.

"Das Man"—a central concept in Heidegger's existentialist philosophy, discussed in his famous work Being and Time (German: Sein und Zeit [pronunciation: Zine oont Tsite]). In German, this phrase literally means 'one' or 'they'—but in Heidegger's sense it represents a kind of impersonal, anonymous, collective consciousness-structure that unconsciously controls human daily thought, behavior, and social habits. In English it is often called "The They."

Heidegger called human existence Dasein—a German word, pronounced Da-zine, meaning "being-there" or "existence-in-the-world." This Dasein means that humans always live their existence within the world (being-in-the-world, German: In-der-Welt-sein). In this everyday 'living,' without thinking of themselves, they often become absorbed in the language, thoughts, and behaviors that "Das Man" or "others" (die Anderen) are doing. Then humans say, "This is how everyone does it," "This is normal," "What will people say?"—these are all expressions of "Das Man."

In Heidegger's philosophy, the concept of "die Anderen" (German: the others) is an extremely important pillar of his "Dasein" analysis. "Dasein" means humans—who understand themselves and the world through the experience of "being-in-the-world." But this "being-in-the-world" is never singular; humans always live with others. They don't 'arrive' or get thrown into the world alone—rather they are born into an interconnected existence woven from relationships, society, language, and culture. This interconnected state is what Heidegger called "Being-with" (Mitsein)—that is, humans are fundamentally co-existential.

In Heidegger's philosophy, Mitsein—the German word comes from mit ("with") and sein ("existence" or being); literally meaning "co-existence" or "being-with-others." This is one of the fundamental concepts in his Sein und Zeit (1927)—Being and Time—where he explains human existence (Dasein) as a being that is never alone but always understands its own being through "being-with-others."

Where Descartes defined humans as res cogitans—a "thinking soul"—Heidegger shatters this solitary, introspective human. He says, "Humans are not separate 'minds' but relational beings." We are born "thrown" (Geworfenheit) into the world, and that world is from the beginning constituted by others—language, culture, behavior, social structures, even the language of thought is inherited from others. Thus human "being-in-the-world" means being-with-others (being-with or Mitsein).

This "Mitsein" is not a subsequent social addition; it is the fundamental structure of human existence. The idea that humans are "first alone, then join society"—this notion is wrong according to Heidegger. Rather, they are always born into "co-existence," and that co-existence makes their world intelligible. Language, meaning, ethics, values—everything emerges from experiences shared "with others." Thus Heidegger says, "Existence is essentially co-existence" (Existence is essentially being-with.)
Share this article

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *