Brain and mind have always been at odds with one another! Yet those whose brains move faster than their hearts, whose emotional capacity falls short, or those rare few blessed enough to have forged a marriage between brain and mind—for them, this antagonism hardly registers as something to puzzle over. We spend most of our lives following the brain's logic and lose the trail of our own heart. To understand another's heart, one must first understand one's own. The injunction "Know thyself!" has not gained such prominence without reason. He who spends all his time with himself yet cannot enter the sanctum of his own being, who lacks the capacity to understand himself—such a person cannot possibly understand another human being either. It is much the same as this: one cannot truly love another if one does not love oneself. That is simply how it works! Yet reality is not a believer in mere wanderings within the chambers of the heart. Here, the brain's machinery is evident, its precise calculations running the whole of life! But there is a caveat here too…without the heart's urgency, those who live by brain alone would never feel the desire to seek life's mysteries, and thus that very curiosity would never be born. But we are sentimental Bengalis, after all. So even if we do not show much interest in this mechanics, this brain's game, or the fine accounting of the two, when it comes to displaying warmth or standing by a complete stranger as "O friend!" in their hour of need—ah, there we show enthusiasm aplenty! This is why, even though we have not yet inscribed our names in the ledger of lightning-quick success, we have earned considerable reputation for hospitality and emotional generosity. Yet we harbor no regret about this; if anything, we take some pride in it! In the fulfillment of human duty lies the cultivation of our humanity, and at day's end, we sentimental Bengalis tend to this most carefully! If we gave all weight to the brain alone, then there would be no difference between a machine and a human! Yet I say it again—without some realism, it is terribly hard to survive life's battle. Thus, merely peeking through the heart's windows, or drowning in the bottomless ocean of the heart's whims while rendering the brain entirely useless, and seeking to dwell in the palace of pleasure—such a thing is quite impossible! Despite all else, only an intimate friendship between heart and brain can forge that priceless humanity. Then one both endures in reality and floats upon the currents of success, tasting its luxuries too! Yes, if one knows how to be, all becomes possible—one need only find the right harmony, on the right path, at the right moment!
# Being and Knowing There is a peculiar distance between being and knowing. We inhabit this distance like a room we cannot leave, though we spend our lives trying to find the door. To be is immediate. The fact of existence requires no permission, no explanation. A stone is. A river is. We are. This presentness, this sheer thereness of things, asks nothing of us and offers nothing in return except itself. Being simply *is* — without prelude, without apology. But knowing — knowing is restless. It arrives late to the scene, always arriving, never quite arriving. When we know something, we have already stepped back from it. We have made it into an object, something to be examined, measured, compared. Knowledge is the shadow cast by being, and shadows, by their nature, are never quite the thing itself. Consider a child before language. The world does not exist as separate facts to be collected like shells on a beach. Everything is simultaneous, fused, alive with presence. Then words arrive. Names carve the world into pieces. The seamless flow becomes taxonomy. And yes, we gain something — language is a tremendous gift. But we also lose something irretrievable: that original unity, that knowing-without-knowledge. An old question haunts philosophy: *Can we ever truly know anything?* But perhaps this is the wrong question. Perhaps the better question is: *What do we sacrifice each time we choose to know?* There are moments — rare, fleeting, but undeniable — when being and knowing briefly reconcile. These are the moments mystics speak of, moments that poets hunt for in language. A sudden recognition, an understanding so complete it no longer feels like understanding but like remembering something you never learned. In such moments, the knower and the known become one. But even as we experience this unity, we are already trying to pin it down, already stepping back to examine it. And it dissolves. Perhaps this is the human condition: to be creatures caught between two shores. We cannot return to the thoughtless immediacy of stone and river. But neither can we ever fully arrive at the kind of knowing that would make us masters of what we know. We are forever in translation, forever converting the unspeakable fact of our existence into the pale currency of words and concepts. Yet this distance between being and knowing — this gap we cannot close — is not mere loss. It is the space where consciousness lives. It is the wound that will not heal and the wound that makes us human. In trying to know ourselves, in pursuing that impossible reconciliation, we discover what it means to be alive, to be aware, to be *here*. We are not stones. We cannot simply *be*. And perhaps that is not tragedy but grace — that we are restless, questioning, forever seeking to bridge the unbridgeable gap. We are the universe becoming conscious of itself, even if that consciousness forever outruns its own object, even if we can never finally say what we are.
Share this article